Static snapshot. A frozen copy of the operator dashboard, safe to open anywhere. The buttons below are drawn but inert — recording a verification and being refused the release is a state change, so it runs on the live app: python src/demo.py --serve.
- From
- billing@primeagrodelhi.com
- Received
- 29 Jun 2026, 21:13
- Subject
- INV-4648
- Reply to
- not a reply
- Thread
- THR00356
The message
Hello Meera,
The facility you have on file was with our previous banking partner, whose relationship with us ended last week. Everything reaches 269243524677 (AXIS0252349) from here.
That covers INV-4648, which remains unsettled, as well as the monthly billing that continues.
Our GST registration is 07CQZID9027Z1Z4.
Total on this one is Rs 83,330.
Flagging that it exists, not asking you to expedite anything.
Thanks,
Kabir Shah
Prime Agro
What the sender resolved to
- Supplier
- VEND0070
- Matched on
- Known sender
- Because
- the email domain is in our supplier records
- Domain matched
- primeagrodelhi.com
- Triage decision
- Needs review
- Change request filed
- doc_3cbe30f31d463e6d
mentions an account, a bank or a settlement destination
Sender matching decides whether a message is read in full. It never decides a payment on its own — a lookalike domain is a reason to look, not a reason to reject.
What happens to the payment
On hold
Identity checks could not be completedR5_tier1_inconclusive
Not evidence of fraud — evidence we could not confirm identity. Verify through a channel the requester does not control.