Static snapshot. A frozen copy of the operator dashboard, safe to open anywhere. The buttons below are drawn but inert — recording a verification and being refused the release is a state change, so it runs on the live app: python src/demo.py --serve.
- From
- billing@vertexpvtltd.com
- Received
- 29 Jun 2026, 18:32
- Subject
- INV-4604
- Reply to
- not a reply
- Thread
- THR00020
The message
Hi Meera,
The facility you have on file was with our previous banking partner, whose relationship with us ended last week. Everything reaches 389525463334 (AXIS0570468) from here.
INV-4604 from October is still open on our ledger, and the retainer runs through March — both are handled under the arrangement above.
Our GST registration is 36DFAYV4833E1Z7.
Total on this one is Rs 29,157.
Going forward please use my direct line and not the accounts desk.
Regards,
Priya Nair
Vertex Pvt Ltd
What the sender resolved to
- Supplier
- VEND0015
- Matched on
- Known sender
- Because
- the email domain is in our supplier records
- Domain matched
- vertexpvtltd.com
- Triage decision
- Needs review
- Change request filed
- doc_4ad06cf754a8254f
mentions an account, a bank or a settlement destination
Sender matching decides whether a message is read in full. It never decides a payment on its own — a lookalike domain is a reason to look, not a reason to reject.
What happens to the payment
On hold
Identity checks could not be completedR5_tier1_inconclusive
Not evidence of fraud — evidence we could not confirm identity. Verify through a channel the requester does not control.